AI-Generated Code Still Needs an Owner
Why faster code generation without clear review rules accelerates technical debt, security gaps, and maintenance risk.
A demo needs different quality than a product: reliable auth, clean data flows, failure cases, logs, tests, safe secrets, and deployment that works beyond localhost. I harden the most important product paths deliberately.
Who this is for
When you built fast with ChatGPT, Cursor, or Claude and the prototype now needs stability, structure, or real error handling.
What you get
How it works
The most important user and payment flows are defined.
Build, tests, configuration, failure cases, and security basics are prioritized.
The project becomes easier to understand for further development or operation.
So you can judge whether the package fits before booking.
I check technical signals and give you a clear priority list, not legal assessments.
Booking creates the order. Work begins only after you confirm the start in the customer panel.
You receive concrete findings sorted by risk, effort, and impact.
Every package includes a written summary of findings and next steps.
Packages
Choose the package that matches your situation. You can always start with an audit and add implementation later.
For prototypes that almost work but are not reliable yet.
Triage plus up to ten hours of targeted repair and stabilization.
one-time payment, plus VAT where applicable
Risk reversal
If the analysis shows that production rescue is not the next sensible step, the amount is fully credited when you book a stabilization sprint.
Commercial terms
When an AI prototype needs to become a real product.
Multi-day cleanup for architecture, security, tests, and deployment readiness.
one-time payment, plus VAT where applicable
Risk reversal
If the analysis shows that production rescue is not the next sensible step, the amount is fully credited when you book a stabilization sprint.
Commercial terms
Ongoing senior control while you continue developing with AI.
Monthly allowance for reviews, small fixes, and technical guardrails.
monthly subscription, plus VAT where applicable
Commercial terms
Results and timelines depend on the concrete state of your website or repository. You only book implementation if the priorities make sense.
Related insights
Supporting articles are matched to this service page and its recommended packages.
Why faster code generation without clear review rules accelerates technical debt, security gaps, and maintenance risk.
AI tools accelerate development, but they also introduce new risks to code security and data. What do companies need to consider for ISO 27001 and compliance?
FAQ
No. It means the most important technical risks are reduced deliberately. The exact scope depends on the state of the project.
Deployment readiness is part of production rescue. Whether a live deployment is included depends on the project.
The stabilization sprint repairs core errors. Production rescue goes deeper into architecture, tests, security, and handover.
Start with a technical check. If the findings are minor, you can stop there, hand the report to your existing team, or book targeted fixes later.
Technical audit and implementation, not legal advice. I check visible signals, integrations, and delivery issues; legal texts and binding legal assessments remain the work of lawyers or privacy consultants.