Website-Pflichtencheckby Jurono
Cursor project stabilization

Cursor shipped fast, but every change breaks something else?

After many AI edits, projects often contain duplicated patterns, inconsistent API flows, fragile components, and unclear database assumptions. I stabilize the core paths so further development becomes more predictable again.

Stabilize Cursor projectView questions

Who this is for

For founders and small teams with AI code

When you built fast with ChatGPT, Cursor, or Claude and the prototype now needs stability, structure, or real error handling.

  • Features were added quickly, but architecture and naming conventions drift apart
  • Build and runtime errors reappear after each AI-generated addition
  • UI, API, auth, and database no longer speak the same language

What you get

What is clear afterwards

  • More stable build and clearer module structure
  • Cleaned-up core flows instead of random one-off fixes
  • Technical handover with sensible next steps

How it works

Process

  1. 1

    Capture project state

    I check build, routing, data flows, and configuration.

  2. 2

    Prioritize core paths

    The most important flows are stabilized before side issues.

  3. 3

    Repair

    Errors are fixed deliberately and documented.

What is not included

So you can judge whether the package fits before booking.

  • Full rewrite without prior triage
  • Ongoing development after the fix
  • Guarantee that every AI codebase can be rescued

No legal advice

I check technical signals and give you a clear priority list, not legal assessments.

Start only after approval

Booking creates the order. Work begins only after you confirm the start in the customer panel.

Clear priorities

You receive concrete findings sorted by risk, effort, and impact.

Documented results

Every package includes a written summary of findings and next steps.

Packages

Book directly or start with an audit.

Choose the package that matches your situation. You can always start with an audit and add implementation later.

AI Code Triage

When the project starts, but nobody knows why it keeps breaking.

390 €

Code review, build/import check, and rescue plan within two business days.

one-time payment, plus VAT where applicable

  • Repository check for broken imports, missing packages, and build errors
  • Assessment: repair, restructure, or discard
  • Prioritized fix list with effort estimate
  • No implementation included

Risk reversal

If the triage finds no actionable problems, we discuss how the price can still be used meaningfully.

Commercial terms

  • one-time payment, plus VAT where applicable
  • work starts only after explicit approval
  • implementation scope is limited to the selected package
Triage code
Recommended

Stabilization Sprint

For prototypes that almost work but are not reliable yet.

1,490 €

Triage plus up to ten hours of targeted repair and stabilization.

one-time payment, plus VAT where applicable

  • Repair build, routing, and core errors
  • Turn unclear AI structure into understandable modules
  • Clean up basic error handling and configuration
  • Short technical handover with next steps

Risk reversal

If the analysis shows that production rescue is not the next sensible step, the amount is fully credited when you book a stabilization sprint.

Commercial terms

  • one-time payment, plus VAT where applicable
  • work starts only after explicit approval
  • implementation scope is limited to the selected package
Start sprint

Code Guidance

Ongoing senior control while you continue developing with AI.

790 €/month

Monthly allowance for reviews, small fixes, and technical guardrails.

monthly subscription, plus VAT where applicable

  • Up to five hours of review or fixes per month
  • Pull request or repository checks
  • Validate architecture and tooling decisions
  • Ideal for founders with ongoing AI prototyping

Commercial terms

  • monthly subscription, plus VAT where applicable
  • minimum term: 3 months
  • unused monthly time does not carry over
  • larger changes and emergency work are scoped separately
Start guidance

Results and timelines depend on the concrete state of your website or repository. You only book implementation if the priorities make sense.

Related insights

Read more before you decide.

Supporting articles are matched to this service page and its recommended packages.

All insights

FAQ

Common questions

Is this only for Cursor projects?

No. The same problems also happen with ChatGPT, Claude, Lovable, and other AI tools.

Do you clean up the folder structure too?

Yes, where it is necessary for stability and maintainability. Large refactors are prioritized instead of started blindly.

Can I keep developing with AI afterwards?

Yes, ideally with clearer guardrails so new AI changes cause less damage.

Get clarity before you commit to fixes.

Start with a technical check. If the findings are minor, you can stop there, hand the report to your existing team, or book targeted fixes later.

Check first, decide laterView AI code rescue

Technical audit and implementation, not legal advice. I check visible signals, integrations, and delivery issues; legal texts and binding legal assessments remain the work of lawyers or privacy consultants.